Event Title

“Some Creatures were Born to Live”: A Psychosocial Analysis of Nada (1944)

Graduation Year

2015

Location

Room E103, Center for Natural Sciences, Illinois Wesleyan University

Start Date

18-4-2015 10:00 AM

End Date

18-4-2015 11:00 AM

Description

Winner of the first Premio Nadal in 1945, Nada (1944), the first published work of then-unknown author Carmen Laforet, has remained a captivating, yet elusive work of Spanish literature. Since its very publication, readers, critics, and even censors have debated the true emancipatory message (or lack there of) within the pseudo-autobiographical, confessional work. While the majority of critics maintain the novel’s characterization as a feminist, female bildungsroman, dissenters cite traces of palimpsestic ennui mediated by the novel’s complex narrative schema as reason to believe otherwise. This critical reading of Nada seeks to shed new light on these debates through the analytical framework of Bronfenbrenner’s Theory of Nested Ecological Systems. The present analysis of relationships, environments, and systems presented to the modern reader throughout the novel seeks to refute critique of the novel as “a primer on self-discipline” (Barry 117) and further support the interpretation of the text as a tale of female emancipation and personal development in conservative post-civil war Spain.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 18th, 10:00 AM Apr 18th, 11:00 AM

“Some Creatures were Born to Live”: A Psychosocial Analysis of Nada (1944)

Room E103, Center for Natural Sciences, Illinois Wesleyan University

Winner of the first Premio Nadal in 1945, Nada (1944), the first published work of then-unknown author Carmen Laforet, has remained a captivating, yet elusive work of Spanish literature. Since its very publication, readers, critics, and even censors have debated the true emancipatory message (or lack there of) within the pseudo-autobiographical, confessional work. While the majority of critics maintain the novel’s characterization as a feminist, female bildungsroman, dissenters cite traces of palimpsestic ennui mediated by the novel’s complex narrative schema as reason to believe otherwise. This critical reading of Nada seeks to shed new light on these debates through the analytical framework of Bronfenbrenner’s Theory of Nested Ecological Systems. The present analysis of relationships, environments, and systems presented to the modern reader throughout the novel seeks to refute critique of the novel as “a primer on self-discipline” (Barry 117) and further support the interpretation of the text as a tale of female emancipation and personal development in conservative post-civil war Spain.