Fidget Tools and On-Task Behavior in First Grade

Presenter and Advisor Information

Major

Educational Studies

Submission Type

Poster

Area of Study or Work

Educational Studies

Faculty Advisor

Leah Nillas

Location

CNS Atrium

Start Date

4-11-2026 8:30 AM

End Date

4-11-2026 9:45 AM

Abstract

This study investigated how fidget tools affect first-grade students’ on-task behavior during independent work. Fidget tools such as stress balls, textured putty, and small manipulatives were defined as sensory supports aimed at enhancing attention and self-regulation rather than serving as toys. Operating within a democratic classroom framework that emphasizes student choice and shared responsibility, students were given optional access to these tools. The research was conducted in a first-grade classroom in Illinois with nine students ages six to seven. During 20–25 minute literacy and math sessions, access to fidget tools alternated. Data were collected through structured observations, student work samples, and reflective notes, with engagement recorded every 30 seconds as on-task or off-task. Results showed that fidget tools supported attention and self-management for some students, although effectiveness varied depending on individual needs and classroom context.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 11th, 8:30 AM Apr 11th, 9:45 AM

Fidget Tools and On-Task Behavior in First Grade

CNS Atrium

This study investigated how fidget tools affect first-grade students’ on-task behavior during independent work. Fidget tools such as stress balls, textured putty, and small manipulatives were defined as sensory supports aimed at enhancing attention and self-regulation rather than serving as toys. Operating within a democratic classroom framework that emphasizes student choice and shared responsibility, students were given optional access to these tools. The research was conducted in a first-grade classroom in Illinois with nine students ages six to seven. During 20–25 minute literacy and math sessions, access to fidget tools alternated. Data were collected through structured observations, student work samples, and reflective notes, with engagement recorded every 30 seconds as on-task or off-task. Results showed that fidget tools supported attention and self-management for some students, although effectiveness varied depending on individual needs and classroom context.