Graduation Year
2020
Publication Date
2017
Abstract
In The Paradox of Punishment, Alan Goldman argues that the mixed theory of punishment is inherently contradictory. Goldman explains that the mixed theory is a combination of two older theories of punishment: retributivism and utilitarianism. The combination of these two theories into a single mixed theory was intended to mitigate these theories’ flaws. However, Goldman asserts that the two theories are incompatible, as justification of one requires dismissal of the other, creating a paradox. While I agree that Goldman’s paradox exists, and that it is logically inescapable, I believe he has neglected several points of analysis which weaken the impact of the paradox. In the following pages, I will provide an explanation of Goldman’s paradox and set forth some criticisms.
Disciplines
English Language and Literature | Rhetoric and Composition
Recommended Citation
Manuel, Aaron, "Goldman’s Paradox: Imperfect Perfection" (2017). Outstanding Gateway Papers. 13.
https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/gateway/13
Comments
First Place, 2016-2017 Best Gateway Essay Contest
Gateway Professor: Mark Criley, Department of Philosophy